Rich Burridge wrote: > http://jurassic.us.oracle.com/~richb/7164358-v1/
Functionally, this is fine -- I can't see any reason why ignoring EBADF from close() would make the program any less correct -- it's just not especially elegant. But upstream can decide for themselves when they get around to fixing the problem. Thanks, Danek _______________________________________________ userland-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
