Ah ha, so I can get it to install if I backout a change, details below.
I'm not sure where this leaves the problem though?
Changing the s11u1b17 live-x86 iso image machine I installed that
pointed to the fcs repo to point to the ipkg dev repo didn't help.
So I went back to a virtual machine I had already installed with
s11u1b15 and had pkg update'd after the install to play around a bit
more. libxml2 failed to install the same way complaining about the same
stuff:
---
pkg install: No solution was found to satisfy constraints
maintained incorporations:
pkg://solaris/consolidation/gfx/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.5.0:20111212T232623Z
{ . . . etc . } and...
No suitable version of required package
pkg://solaris/developer/build/[email protected],5.11-0.153:20101118T212848Z
found:
Reject:
pkg://solaris/developer/build/[email protected],5.11-0.153:20101118T212848Z
Reason: All acceptable versions of 'require' dependency on
pkg:/runtime/python-24 are obsolete
{etc...}
---
The machine has the entire pkg:
root@S11:~# pkg info entire
Name: entire
Summary: Incorporation to lock all system packages to the same build
Description: This package constrains system package versions to the same
build. WARNING: Proper system update and correct package
selection depend on the presence of this incorporation.
Removing this package will result in an unsupported system.
Category: Meta Packages/Incorporations
State: Installed
Publisher: solaris
Version: 0.5.11
Build Release: 5.11
Branch: 0.175.1.0.0.17.0
Packaging Date: Tue May 29 23:24:58 2012
Size: 5.46 kB
FMRI:
pkg://solaris/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.17.0:20120529T232458Z
root@S11:~#
Suspicious of recent changes I removed the change from libxml2's .p5m
file for CR 7108059, basically commented out the depend lines and
republished:
--- a/components/libxml2/libxml2.p5m Thu Feb 23 15:58:00 2012 -0800
+++ b/components/libxml2/libxml2.p5m Fri Feb 24 13:30:24 2012 -0800
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
#
# CDDL HEADER END
#
-# Copyright (c) 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+# Copyright (c) 2011, 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
reserved.
#
<transform file path=usr.*/man/.+ -> default mangler.man.stability
committed>
@@ -123,3 +123,11 @@
link path=usr/lib/libxml2.so target=./libxml2.so.2
link path=usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 target=../../lib/libxml2.so.2
link path=usr/lib/llib-lxml2.ln target=../../lib/llib-lxml2.ln
+
+depend
fmri=library/python-2/libxml2-26@$(IPS_COMPONENT_VERSION),$(BUILD_VERSION) \
+ predicate=runtime/python-26 \
+ type=conditional
+
+depend
fmri=library/python-2/libxml2-27@$(IPS_COMPONENT_VERSION),$(BUILD_VERSION) \
+ predicate=runtime/python-27 \
+ type=conditional
and it now installs fine:
root@S11:~# pkg install pkg://userland/library/libxml2
Packages to update: 1
Create boot environment: No
Create backup boot environment: Yes
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
Completed 1/1 6/6 2.0/2.0
PHASE ACTIONS
Removal Phase 6/6
Install Phase 3/3
Update Phase 17/17
PHASE ITEMS
Package State Update Phase 2/2
Package Cache Update Phase 1/1
Image State Update Phase 2/2
root@S11:~#
Where does this leave me? Is there still a p5m or packaging problem
with libxml (those depend lines?) or should I have installed something
else on my s11u1b17 machines before trying to install libxml2 I built
(the complaints from pkg install didn't make it clear if that was the
case?) or is something else going on here?
Thanks,
Kevin.
On 06/ 7/12 04:27 PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
Kevin Crowe wrote:
Interesting about the repo. I just installed from an image from nana this
morning (I took the live-x86 iso from the s11.1/17/ directory) but I could
have sworn I installed from there before and it pointed to
ipkg.us.oracle.com/solaris11/dev/ ? Maybe not? Or maybe I used the 'full'
iso in the past?
I think the default installers set you up with the release repo, even
though the bits you just installed aren't present in that repo. I didn't
think you'd just installed the machine.
Trying to update my publisher now to see if it helps...
That might make the difference; I'd definitely try that.
The output itself isn't terribly useful for solving this problem. Looks
like most (if not all) of the things it's complaining about are obsolete or
renamed packages, and it's possible that's because it can't find the right
versions of them.
I'm a bit surprised it didn't say anything about libxml2 in there, though.
If you still get errors, you should try giving libxml2 the version you
built to force it to confront why it's unable to do the update.
Danek
_______________________________________________
userland-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
