Rich Burridge wrote:
On 09/24/2012 12:19 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
Rich Burridge wrote:
On 09/24/2012 11:12 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
Rich Burridge wrote:
While you are adding TPNO's, can you also add the component name
and version number
as requested by legal please? For example, see:
.../components/make/make.license
Done, same webrev spot:
https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/userland/steleman/tpno-7199210/tpno-7199210/
.../components/cmake/cmake.license
Looks like the TPNO for cmake 2.8.6 is 6581 not 5551.
Nope. 5551 "CMake Version 2.6.2 / Version 2.6.2 and higher". I don't
have a specific approval for 2.8.6.
Then I'm confused. 6581 was raised by April. If 5551 is a perfectly
valid TPNO
for cmake 5.8.6, then why was a new TPNO raised?
Looking at this logically:
cmake 2.6.2 is under TPNO 5551 - AWAITING FREDS APPROVAL
https://stbeehive.oracle.com/content/dav/st/ThirdParty%20Approval%20Documents/Documents/Solaris/Legacy%20SARF/SFW/CMAKE_2.6.2_SARF.sxw
cmake 2.8.6 is under TPNO 6581 - FULLY APPROVED TPNO
https://stbeehive.oracle.com/content/dav/st/ThirdParty%20Approval%20Documents/Documents/Solaris/New%20SARF/Userland/CMAKE_2.8.6_SARF.odt
We have cmake 2.8.6 in the gate. It also contains the right license file
information.
So I conclude we have an "old" TPNO in the system under legacy 5551 that
shipped
with S11 is now superseded with the 6581 for version 2.8.6 in S11U1.
The only action here is to update 5551 to reflect its superseded - thats
my action.
There is no change required to the code for cmake.
.../components/subversion/subversion.license
Looks like the TPNO for svn 1.7.5 is 9086 not 9047.
Nope. 9047 is for Subversion 1.7.2 which is the same license as
1.7.5. I don't have a specific approval for 1.7.5. 9046 is for
Subversion 1.6.5, which is a different license. I know nothing about
9086.
Again, if 9047 is valid for svn 1.7.5, why was TPNO raised by Fred for
svn 1.7.5?
OK, we are getting hit by older TPNO's coming through the system.
TPNO 9086 is for svn 1.7.5 and thats the TPNO to use in the license file
going forwards.
Thats the CR action that is needed for svn 1.7.5 - to add TPNO 9086 and
license attributes.
Again the action is to clean up 9046 and 9047 for the older versions -
again thats another task for me.
.../components/tcl/tcl/tcl.license
Looks like the TPNO for TCL v8.5.9 is 9083 not 9079
I don't have a specific approval for 8.5.9. I have 9079 for 8.4.18,
which is the same license as 8.5.9.
We have 8.5.9 in the gate - the TPNO for this is 9083 - again that
number needs to be in the
license file and clean up needed on older TPNO's.
Similar question for this one.
Perhaps April or Fred can explain what's going on here...
Hope this helps explain, old legacy TPNO's are coming through and need
some TLC.
Oh hmm............
Fred
_______________________________________________
userland-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
