二级存储功能虚机有没有销毁重启。
yan_5...@163.com 发件人: xusz 发送时间: 2014-11-27 13:39 收件人: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: 答复: 虚拟机启动不起来的问题 我重新改sec查找更改参数 ,192.168.0.0/24 重新注册模板为什么下载一直未就绪, 如何解决。 -----邮件原件----- 发件人: users-cn-return-4130-xusz=chinanetcenter....@cloudstack.apache.org [mailto:users-cn-return-4130-xusz=chinanetcenter....@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表 贝为标 发送时间: 2014年11月27日 10:29 收件人: users-cn 主题: Re: 虚拟机启动不起来的问题 xusz,您好! 你把它删了,你还问它什么问题?哈哈哈 ~~~~~ ======= 2014-11-27 10:15:57 您在来信中写道:======= > > > > > > >HI ALL > >上次在平台上删除了二级存储,发现模板里面虚拟机的镜像都变成打X状态,现在启动 >虚拟机的时候都不能起来,求助大家排查是什么问题。谢谢 > > > > > >14-11-27 10:11:33,089 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, hosts: >null > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,091 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Root volume is ready, need to place VM in volume's >cluster > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,091 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Vol[7333|vm=7162|ROOT] is READY, changing >deployment plan to use this pool's dcId: 1 , podId: 1 , and clusterId: 10 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,091 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: random > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,091 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from >dc:1, pod:1,cluster:10, requested cpu: 2000, requested ram: 2147483648 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,091 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: Yes > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,091 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) This VM has last host_id specified, trying to >choose the same host: 89 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,094 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Checking if host: 89 has enough capacity for >requested CPU: 2000 and requested RAM: 2147483648 , >cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 2.0 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Hosts's actual total CPU: 36256 and CPU after >applying overprovisioning: 72512 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) We need to allocate to the last host again, so >checking if there is enough reserved capacity > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) We need to allocate to the last host again, so >checking if there is enough reserved capacity > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Reserved CPU: 0 , Requested CPU: 2000 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Reserved CPU: 0 , Requested CPU: 2000 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Reserved RAM: 0 , Requested RAM: 2147483648 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) STATS: Failed to alloc resource from host: 89 >reservedCpu: 0, requested cpu: 2000, reservedMem: 0, requested mem: >2147483648 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Host does not have enough reserved CPU available, >cannot allocate to this host. > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) The last host of this VM does not have enough >capacity > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Cannot choose the last host to deploy this VM > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,096 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Searching resources only under specified Cluster: >10 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,100 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Checking resources in Cluster: 10 under Pod: 1 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,100 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Calling HostAllocators to find suitable hosts > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,100 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 >pod:1 cluster:10 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,101 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 >hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-89-Routing]] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,102 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for >allocation after prioritization: [Host[-89-Routing]] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,102 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=2000Mhz, >Ram=2048 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,104 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 89 has >enough capacity for requested CPU: 2000 and requested RAM: 2147483648 , >cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 2.0 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,105 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU: >36256 and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 72512 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,105 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free CPU: 54512 , >Requested CPU: 2000 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,105 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Free RAM: 5816790400 , >Requested RAM: 2147483648 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,105 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host has enough CPU and >RAM available > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,105 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc CPU from >host: 89, used: 18000, reserved: 0, actual total: 36256, total with >overprovisioning: 72512; requested cpu:2000,alloc_from_last_host?:false >,considerReservedCapacity?: true > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,105 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) STATS: Can alloc MEM from >host: 89, used: 18656264192, reserved: 0, total: 24473054592; requested mem: >2147483648,alloc_from_last_host?:false ,considerReservedCapacity?: true > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,105 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found a suitable host, >adding to list: 89 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,105 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 1 >suitable hosts > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,106 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type): >(7333,ROOT) > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,106 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Volume is in READY state and has pool already >allocated, checking if pool can be reused, poolId: 514 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,107 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Planner need not allocate a pool for this volume >since its READY > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,107 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Trying to find a potenial host and associated >storage pools from the suitable host/pool lists for this VM > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,107 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Checking if host: 89 can access any suitable >storage pool for volume: ROOT > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,108 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Host: 89 can access pool: 514 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,108 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Found a potential host id: 89 name: xenserver203 >and associated storage pools for this VM > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,109 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Returning Deployment Destination: >Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-->Pool(Id ) >)] : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(10)-Host(89)-Storage()] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,109 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Deployment found - >P0=VM[User|9ef850c6-d899-4080-b7fc-af9b39125408], >P0=Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-->Pool ( >Id))] : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(10)-Host(89)-Storage()] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,153 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) VM state transitted from :Starting to Starting with >event: OperationRetryvm's original host id: 89 new host id: 89 host id >before state transition: null > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,154 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) VM starting again on the last host it was stopped >on > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,157 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Hosts's actual total CPU: 36256 and CPU after >applying overprovisioning: 72512 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,157 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) We are allocating VM, increasing the used capacity >of this host:89 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,157 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) We are allocating VM, increasing the used capacity >of this host:89 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,157 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Current Used CPU: 18000 , Free CPU:54512 ,Requested >CPU: 2000 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,157 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Current Used RAM: 18656264192 , Free RAM:5816790400 >,Requested RAM: 2147483648 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,157 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) We are allocating VM to the last host again, so >adjusting the reserved capacity if it is not less than required > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,157 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Reserved CPU: 0 , Requested CPU: 2000 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,157 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Reserved RAM: 0 , Requested RAM: 2147483648 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,157 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) CPU STATS after allocation: for host: 89, old used: >18000, old reserved: 0, actual total: 36256, total with overprovisioning: >72512; new used:20000, reserved:0; requested cpu:2000,alloc_from_last:true > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,157 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) RAM STATS after allocation: for host: 89, old used: >18656264192, old reserved: 0, total: 24473054592; new used: 20803747840, >reserved: 0; requested mem: 2147483648,alloc_from_last:true > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,188 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) VM is being created in podId: 1 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,191 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Lock is acquired for network id 204 as a part of >network implement > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,191 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Network id=204 is already implemented > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,191 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Lock is released for network id 204 as a part of >network implement > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,226 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Changing active number of nics for network id=204 >on 1 > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,249 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Asking JuniperSRX to prepare for >Nic[26254-7162-b817996e-d3f0-4e62-b6e5-3bef8ca02848-192.168.3.246] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,251 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Asking Netscaler to prepare for >Nic[26254-7162-b817996e-d3f0-4e62-b6e5-3bef8ca02848-192.168.3.246] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,252 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Asking F5BigIP to prepare for >Nic[26254-7162-b817996e-d3f0-4e62-b6e5-3bef8ca02848-192.168.3.246] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,254 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Asking VirtualRouter to prepare for >Nic[26254-7162-b817996e-d3f0-4e62-b6e5-3bef8ca02848-192.168.3.246] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,462 DEBUG >[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (HA-Worker-1:work-14354) >Lock is acquired for network id 204 as a part of router startup in >Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-->Pool(Id ) >)] : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(10)-Host(89)-Storage()] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,465 DEBUG >[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (HA-Worker-1:work-14354) >Lock is released for network id 204 as a part of router startup in >Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-->Pool(Id ) >)] : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(10)-Host(89)-Storage()] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,472 DEBUG >[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (HA-Worker-1:work-14354) >Applying dhcp entry in network Ntwk[204|Guest|6] > >2014-11-27 10:11:33,486 DEBUG [agent.manager.ClusteredAgentAttache] >(HA-Worker-1:work-14354) Seq 89-2067791929: Forwarding Seq 89-2067791929: { >Cmd , MgmtId: 110480925280, via: 89, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, >[{"routing.DhcpEntryCommand":{"vmMac":"06:57:b0:00:00:79","vmIpAddress":"19 2 >.168.3.246","vmName":"9ef850c6-d899-4080-b7fc-af9b39125408","defaultRouter" : >"192.168.3.51","defaultDns":"192.168.3.172","accessDetails":{"router.guest. i >p":"192.168.3.172","zone.network.type":"Basic","router.name":"r-7170-VM","r o >uter.ip":"169.254.1.106"},"wait":0}}] } to 165036460088 > >2014-11-27 10:11:43,397 DEBUG >[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone >host is ready, but secondary storage vm template: 1 is not ready on >secondary storage: 27 > >2014-11-27 10:11:43,397 DEBUG >[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone 1 >is not ready to launch secondary storage VM yet > >2014-11-27 10:11:47,741 DEBUG >[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers. > >2014-11-27 10:11:53,388 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-332:null) Ping from 76 > >2014-11-27 10:11:53,396 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-31:null) Ping from 43 > >2014-11-27 10:11:54,182 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-303:null) Seq 76-2043346946: Executing request > >2014-11-27 10:11:54,340 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-404:null) Seq 43-396689410: Executing request > >2014-11-27 10:11:54,654 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-303:null) Seq 76-2043346946: Response Received: > >2014-11-27 10:11:54,655 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] >(DirectAgent-303:null) Seq 76-2043346946: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: >110480925280, via: 76, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, >[{"ClusterSyncAnswer":{"_clusterId":4,"_newStates":{},"_isExecuted":false," r >esult":true,"wait":0}}] } > >2014-11-27 10:11:54,919 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-404:null) Seq 43-396689410: Response Received: > >2014-11-27 10:11:54,919 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] >(DirectAgent-404:null) Seq 43-396689410: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: >110480925280, via: 43, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, >[{"ClusterSyncAnswer":{"_clusterId":1,"_newStates":{},"_isExecuted":false," r >esult":true,"wait":0}}] } > >2014-11-27 10:12:13,397 DEBUG >[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone 1 >is ready to launch secondary storage VM > >2014-11-27 10:12:17,741 DEBUG >[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers. > >2014-11-27 10:12:43,396 DEBUG >[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone >host is ready, but secondary storage vm template: 1 is not ready on >secondary storage: 95 > >2014-11-27 10:12:43,397 DEBUG >[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone 1 >is not ready to launch secondary storage VM yet > >2014-11-27 10:12:43,397 DEBUG >[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone 1 >is not ready to launch secondary storage VM yet > >2014-11-27 10:12:47,741 DEBUG >[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers. > >2014-11-27 10:12:53,388 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-201:null) Ping from 43 > >2014-11-27 10:12:53,388 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-250:null) Ping from 76 > >2014-11-27 10:12:53,388 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-250:null) Ping from 76 > >2014-11-27 10:12:54,182 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-36:null) Seq 76-2043346946: Executing request > >2014-11-27 10:12:54,339 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-250:null) Seq 43-396689410: Executing request > >2014-11-27 10:12:54,654 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-36:null) Seq 76-2043346946: Response Received: > >2014-11-27 10:12:54,655 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] >(DirectAgent-36:null) Seq 76-2043346946: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: >110480925280, via: 76, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, >[{"ClusterSyncAnswer":{"_clusterId":4,"_newStates":{},"_isExecuted":false," r >esult":true,"wait":0}}] } > >2014-11-27 10:12:54,906 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >(DirectAgent-250:null) Seq 43-396689410: Response Received: > >2014-11-27 10:12:54,906 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] >(DirectAgent-250:null) Seq 43-396689410: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: >110480925280, via: 43, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, >[{"ClusterSyncAnswer":{"_clusterId":1,"_newStates":{},"_isExecuted":false," r >esult":true,"wait":0}}] } > >2014-11-27 10:13:13,396 DEBUG >[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone >host is ready, but secondary storage vm template: 1 is not ready on >secondary storage: 8 > >2014-11-27 10:13:13,396 DEBUG >[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone 1 >is not ready to launch secondary storage VM yet > >aryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone 1 is not ready to launch >secondary storage VM yet > >2014-11-27 10:13:17,741 DEBUG >[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >(RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers. > > > > > > > > >__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 10753 (20141120) __________ > >The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > >http://www.eset.com > > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 致 礼! 贝为标 beiweib...@163.com 2014-11-27