>>Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and a 2.0 version? I don't think that would be possible - IronPython makes heavy use of 2.0 specific features such as Lightweight Code Generation Thanks, Sriram
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.R. Sprinkhuizen Sent: 01 April 2005 04:17 To: users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com Subject: RE: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole > Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in voting ;-) Count me in. I don't like fepy. > I'm happy we're getting new releases at all, frankly. Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and a 2.0 version? Cheers! Reginald ________________________________ SwitchBL8's gebazel <http://www.rare-it.com/b2e/blogs/switchbl8> _______________________________________________ users-ironpython.com mailing list users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
