----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 9:19
PM
Subject: RE: [IronPython] IronPython 0.9
released
Hi Lorenzo,
It would mean that some IronPython features may not be
available on .Net 1.1 but it may be useful for some users who for some reason
may not be switching to .Net 2.0 immediately. We haven't reached decision on
this one yet and it would be interesting to hear feedback as to how important
having a version if IronPython running on .Net 1.1 is for you.
I hope I didn't miss anything and this answers your
question.
Martin
________________________________________
From: Lorenzo Bolognini
Sent: 8/4/2005 2:40
AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Cc:
Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython 0.9
released
On 8/2/05, Martin Maly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Known issues:
>Rebuilding IronPython on the Community Technology Preview
release,
> version 2.0.50630.0 will fix the
problem. We decided to maintain the
> dependency of
the released binaries on .NET 2.0 Beta 2 (version
>
2.0.50215.44) because we believe the Beta 2 release is more widely
adopted.
So basically what's the story for the .NET 2 runtime support?
Will you
make it possible to integrate IronPy in VS
.NET 2005 final release and
use the .NET 2 runtime to
develop ASP .NET apps?
If I remember correctly IronPy 1.0 will only be compatible
with the
1.1 runtime. Will it support something like
partial classes à la C# so
that the code-behind file
doesn't get polluted with the IDE generated
code? I
wouldn't really care about other .NET 2 features if I could
have that so I would happily use .NET 1.1 to develop aspx.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
_______________________________________________
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
_______________________________________________
users-ironpython.com
mailing
list
users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
