Hi Daniel, That depends on how much time and work is required, and how difficult that work would be, since I also work a full-time job and am extremely busy on weekends.
Who would provide the server and set up the software? Could you please describe the required tasks for "managing proposals + vote" more specifically? -- Benjamin L. Russell On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:47:11 +0200, Daniel Diaz <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Benjamin, > >I'm ok for a nice logo for GNU Prolog. >Would you be a volunteer to manage proposals + vote ? > >Daniel > >Benjamin L. Russell a ecrit : >> How about something similar to one of the following: >> >> PowerLoom? Knowledge Representation & Reasoning System (see the logo): >> http://www.isi.edu/isd/LOOM/PowerLoom/ >> >> The above-mentioned logo is also used on the following Prolog-related >> page: >> >> Prolog-style `append': >> http://www.isi.edu/isd/LOOM/PowerLoom/documentation/examples/append.html >> >> Another alternative is the following jigsaw puzzle logo, used at one >> site for a course in formal logic: >> >> CSC Courses: Formal Logic (see the logo): >> http://www.personal.ceu.hu/comp/logics.htm >> >> (It seems that logos using either some variation of a "P" (for >> "Prolog") or a cluster of four interlocking jigsaw pieces, possibly >> each representing a different Prolog-related theme, similarly to the >> following, would be a possibility: >> >> What Is Critical Thinking?: >> http://www.control-z.com/pgs/what_is_critical_thinking.html >> ) >> >> I think that GNU Prolog needs a logo. Why not hold a logo >> competition, similar to the following recently held for another >> functional programming language: >> >> http://www.haskell.org/logos/poll.html >> >> using the Condorcet Internet Voting Service: >> >> Condorcet Internet Voting Service: >> http://www.cs.cornell.edu/w8/~andru/civs/rp.html >> >> We could invite participants to submit entries, and use the Condorcet >> method (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method), to allow >> each voter to rank all entries in order of preference, in order to >> choose the "candidate who would beat each of the other candidates in a >> run-off election, if such a candidate exists." This method has the >> advantage of eventually choosing a candidate who is most universally >> favored by all voters, even if the candidate is not ranked in first >> place by any voter, since all voters rank all candidates. The >> Concorcet method was recently used in the above-mentioned logo >> competition to choose a logo for a certain functional programming >> language. >> >> -- Benjamin L. Russell >> >> On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:21:21 +0200, Daniel Diaz >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> No logo has been designed (I'm not good for this ;-)). All suggestions >>> are welcome ! >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> Benjamin L. Russell a ecrit : >>> >>>> Is a representative logo available for the Windows version of GNU >>>> Prolog 1.3.1? >>>> >>>> -- Benjamin L. Russell >>>> >>>> -- Benjamin L. Russell / DekuDekuplex at Yahoo dot com http://dekudekuplex.wordpress.com/ Translator/Interpreter / Mobile: +011 81 80-3603-6725 "Furuike ya, kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto." -- Matsuo Basho^ _______________________________________________ Users-prolog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/users-prolog
