I'm looking into clustered HA deployments with zero message loss under one point-of-failure.
My best options seem to be: A) Network of Brokers with fast journaling and jdbc persistance B) JDBC Master Slave BUT, what if broker dies before it writes its batch to the database, but after it completes its fast-journal? Is there a way that: A) another broker in the network can pick up its journal data? B) the slave broker can pick up its journal data? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Recover-a-failed-Broker%27s-Journal-%28by-Database-of-Another-Broker%29-tf3275595s2354.html#a9109462 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
