Thare are no errors, but both become the master.
James.Strachan wrote: > > Is there any kind of error in the log; or do both brokers just become > the master? > > On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> March 8th and used the following url >> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/activemq-4.1.1-RC1/maven2/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/4.1.1/ >> >> >> James.Strachan wrote: >> > >> > On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Iam using mysql 5.1 and it seems like master slave lock issue is still >> >> not >> >> fixed on 4.1.1 latest snapshot. would appreciate any feedback from >> >> activemq >> >> guys. >> > >> > Which date of the 4.1-SNAPSHOT did you try? >> > -- >> > >> > James >> > ------- >> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-locking-with-MYSQL-is-not-working-with-4.1.1-tf3399897s2354.html#a9474993 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-locking-with-MYSQL-is-not-working-with-4.1.1-tf3399897s2354.html#a9475617 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
