We are setting up a master/slave configuration with ActiveMQ. Our object-relational-mapping framework uses a topic to synchronize cache changes across VMs. These messages do not need to be persisted into a database or file store. I was wondering if a master/slave broker configuration could be set up that didn't need the JDBC persistence adapter?
Thanks in advance. Franz Garsombke -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-Configuration-with-Memory-Persistence--tf3655809s2354.html#a10213401 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
