Nicky Sandhu wrote: > > I am in the process of trying to setup a network of brokers for HA behind > a load balancer. The aim is to allow clients to see a virtual broker > (which is really load balanced and with fail over) with a single IP/port. >
We've been testing a simpler failover strategy with the same goal of hosting brokers behind a load balancer. Similar requirements of persistence on all messages and easy failover but with the additional requirement that we use STOMP clients. These clients do not have the java connector logic in them to do failover so using the load balancer in front works great for that. Our strategy is to use the "network of brokers" hosted behind a load balancer. http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html What are the extra benefits of going to the more complicated setup of pairs of master/slave's behind the load balancer instead of a flat space of a network of brokers? Joel Schaubert -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-have-a-highly-available-and-scalable-setup-using-network-of-brokers--tf3954224s2354.html#a11222027 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
