sorry about that.. version 4.1.1
rajdavies wrote: > > which version of amq ? The version really makes a difference to the > answer ;) > > On Jul 25, 2007, at 10:14 PM, razaimperial wrote: > >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Like others, Im doing a stress test on MQ. I dont think I have a >> config >> issue but just in case. >> >> I am simulating lots of topic from 14 connections (in a real >> deployment each >> stream would be a seperate connection), each connection has around >> X number >> of topic. There is just one consumer subscribed to all of these >> topics. The >> message size is quite large though, about 25k per packet, sent >> every 15 >> seconds for each topic. >> >> The broker does fine until about 100 topics per connection in terms >> of CPU >> utilization, but the memory footprint is quite large. The utilization >> progressively increases (starts at around 5% (of 4GB)) and >> increases as more >> topics join the system. However it doesnt go past 15.5% >> (translating to >> around 600mb) and after 15.5 percent first the CPU utlization goes >> to 99% >> lingers there for a few seconds (the broker is sending messages at >> this >> point) and the broker just dies. >> >> I've tried increasing the memory assigned to the broker but Im not >> sure if >> Im doing it right. First off, there was the same behaviour by >> default, even >> though the documentation says the default is 20mb RAM use, clearly >> not the >> case. But even when I change that to 600mb or more, I get the exact >> same >> behaviour. >> >> Im editing the default apachemq.xml file that ships with the >> installation. >> >> Help much appreciated >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ApacheMQ-broker- >> memory-consumption-and-crash-tf4147994s2354.html#a11800104 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ApacheMQ-broker-memory-consumption-and-crash-tf4147994s2354.html#a11800399 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
