Hi Joe. We were in contact few months ago .... My big project is begun and we have to find the best topology and test it
when I look web site "Performance" : Performance differs greatly depending on many different factors the network topology transport protocols used quality of service hardware, network, JVM and operating system number of producers, number of consumers distribution of messages across destinations along with message size For us, it is possible to segment our architecture by role and I would want to use this possibility to imagine the best topology. If I have more than 1000 servers on two sites, I don't want that answer jumps over these 1000 servers and cross many times over MPLS networks, before reaching requestor. I can imagine creating a pool of answer queues with same prefixes and using them , but it's not as simple as it appears because I have to be sure that one answer queue name is not used by other servers which have the same role. Using Temporary queues with only name over complete architecture seem to be a better solution. Eric-AWL Hi Eric, As long as there exists the appropriate forwarding bridge(s), w/correct networkTTL, from the consumer's broker back to the producer's broker, there shouldn't be a problem with using the request/reply model and temp queues. I recommend moving up to 5.1. There have been some issues surrounding 'duplex' connections; you may want to check the JIRA for their status. Joe http://www.ttmsolutions.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Large-networks-of-brokers%2C-dynamically-included-destinations-and-temporary-queues-tp19070151p19083163.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
