Thanks for the response. I will check out Camel to see if that makes sense for my use case. (If that's the "best practice", I think the JMS-to-JMS Bridge page on the ActiveMQ site should be updated to recommend that.)
In the meantime, I've already invested a lot of time into the ActiveMQ solution and I feel like I'm very close. Do you see a quick change that I could make to activemq.xml to get it working? Thanks again, Dave James.Strachan wrote: > > I'd be tempted to use Camel instead... > > <route> > <from uri="activemq:MyQueue"/> > <to uri="jms:SomeOtherQueue"/> > </route> > > http://activemq.apache.org/camel/enterprise-integration-patterns.html > > then under the covers its using Spring and their JMS helper classes etc > http://activemq.apache.org/camel/jms.html > > <original message snipped> > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://open.iona.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jms-to-jms-bridge-%28to-JBoss-MQ%29-tp19112646p19113230.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
