James.Strachan wrote: > > 2008/8/25 Artur Siekielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> From what I've understood the Camel Resequencer is not a solution for us, >> because it collects items for some time (defined by timeout) and then >> sends >> them to output queue. We need a real priority queue where even old >> messages >> can be reordered. > > How can you possibly implement any kind of queue reordering without > waiting until you've more than one message to reorder them? :) > >
If your problem is "queue reordering", ie. sending sorted contents of one queue to another, I don't see other solutions too. We would like to have such a queue that when a consumer consumes a messages, it gets a message with highest priority. So the difference is that Resequencer's output is a queue, while the output of our potential priority queue is a consumer. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LIFO-%28not-FIFO%29-queues-tp19088116p19158762.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
