we can't handle composite transports within composite transports - as randomize is false, failover will walk the urls in order

On 2 Dec 2008, at 13:48, yinghe0101 wrote:


failover://(tcp://primary:61616,tcp://secondary:61616)? randomize=false&maxReconnectAttempts=10 will work. I tried before. What I intend to configure is to have a primary group of brokers and a secondary group of brokers, both group are using
failover, so:
failover://(failover://(tcp://primarygroup-broker1:61616,
tcp://primarygroup-broker2:61616)? randomize=false&maxReconnectAttempts=50,
failover://(tcp://secondarygroup-broker1:61616,
tcp://secondarygroup-broker2:61616)? randomize=false&maxReconnectAttempts=10)?randomize=false

is it possible to configure the above? I know the above gives me exception
of invalid broker url.

best,
ying

rajdavies wrote:

Try:
failover://(tcp://primary:61616,tcp://secondary:61616)?
randomize=false&maxReconnectAttempts=10



On 2 Dec 2008, at 00:09, yinghe0101 wrote:


hi,
Can I do the configure the following activemq url on the client side?

failover://(failover://(tcp://primary:61616,tcp://secondary:61616)?
randomize=false&maxReconnectAttempts=10,
failover://(tcp://primary:61616,tcp://secondary:61616)?
randomize=false&maxReconnectAttempts=10)?randomize=false

It gives me Invalid broker url exception thrown by new
URI(brokerURL). Is
there any way I can achieve the above semantic? what is the syntax?
Thanks

best,
Ying


--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/failover-URI-tp20783475p20783475.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/failover-URI-tp20783475p20792524.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Reply via email to