Thanks, that looks perfect! It seems "wierd" to create a Session object and pass an ActiveMQSession flag in...
CB Dejan Bosanac wrote: > > Hi, > > you could try to use individual acknowledgment instead of the client one. > > http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1732 > > I'll add see to document it better soon, though. > > Cheers > -- > Dejan Bosanac > > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:12 AM, centis <centis_b...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> We have a database notification hook that gives us access to all database >> operations. We use this hook to send notifications of updates to several >> different services. The operations include a transaction id and I >> collect >> them in memory until the transaction is committed. The problem is I only >> want to acknowledge the messages that I have received all the operations >> for. >> >> Is there some way to do this? Or maybe a suggestion for an alternate >> implementation? >> >> Thanks, >> CB >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Selectively-acknowledging-messages.-tp22173201p22173201.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > ----- > Dejan Bosanac > > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Selectively-acknowledging-messages.-tp22173201p22181858.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
