Sorry for that stupid question:) - it is clear now.
Postol wrote: > > Hello All, > > maybe it is a stupid question, but I am little bit confused, which objects > should be used, when I am developing clients, which will communicate with > ActiveMQ broker. > > I am not sure if I should use types from org.apache.activemq namespace or > from javax.jms namespace. > > I know, that javax.jms namespace is original jms implementation and am not > sure what happens if I use types from org.apache.activemq namespace (eg. > ActiveMQSession, ActiveMQQueue, ActiveMQTopicPublisher etc.). > > Which one should I use in client implementation? > > Is there any difference? I can see that types from org.apache.activemq > namespace have more members and methods that ones from javax.jms > namespace. Is it correct and safe to use all types from > org.apache.activemq namespace? > > Thanks and regards, > > Postol > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-types-to-use---org.apache.activemq-namespace-or-javax.jms-namespace-tp22565163p22586154.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
