I have two consumers C1 and C2 and two brokers B1 and B2 that see each other. I have one producer P1.
P1 is connected initially to B1 and C2 is connected to B1. C1 is connected to B2. The initial start is as follows: P1 produces 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, (B1 failed), 7, 8, 9, 10. C1 gets 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 8 C2 gets 2, 4, 6, (B1 failed), 10 As seen above, I fail B1. P1 and C2 failover to B2. But now the strange things happen. C1 starts to get messages out of order. Is there a way to prevent this? How can I ensure that in case of broker failure, after failover has occurred, consumers will receive messages in order. To be specific, how can I assure that msg # 8 is processed before message # 9 & 10? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-preserve-order-of-messages-in-Network-of-Brokers--tp23353328p23353328.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
