...now I am getting a little bit confused. I can see the ActiveMQ
ConnectionFactory registered in my Global-JNDI-Namespace. (Did you see what
I posted in the JBoss forum ?) So did I find a bug ? In your described case
no other JMS-Provider than JBoss Messaging could register objects in JBoss
JNDI ?? sounds confusing :-/
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Gary Tully<gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> use both! let the remote clients use the activemq initial context factory
>> and let components within jboss use the jboss provider.
>
> Gary's suggestion is correct because it's actually not possible to add
> resources to the java: context in the JBoss JNDI. The java: context is
> read-only except for the main thread (JBoss).
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JNDI-with-ActiveMQ-embedded-in-JBoss-AS-tp25151104p25167537.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
