On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 16:10 -0700, lujan99 wrote: > > fine , thanks. When I use ClientAcknowledge it's all ok. > > Now, in a Request/Response method is safe to use same session object used to > receive message to create a producer to reply?? >
Yes, however just as in JMS the NMS API recommends the following. If a client desires to have one thread produce messages while others consume them, the client should use a separate session for its producing thread. Regards Tim. > > Thanks!! > > > magellings wrote: > > > > What acknowledgement mode are you using? It's my understanding if you are > > using Transactional or ClientAcknowledge you shouldn't have this problem. > > > > With AutoAcknowledge messages are buffered on the consumer end and are > > lost if not processed when the consumer shuts down. > > > > > > lujan99 wrote: > >> > >> After some test (and more test) my conclusion: > >> > >> If you don't want to lose any messages I can't use any Listener method, > >> Listener is ok except when my client shutdown. > >> then I need to use some Receive with consumer.prefetchSize=0. > >> > >> Is ok? > >> > >> note: I test with java/groovy (jms-api) and don't have this issue. > >> > >> someone is using NMS / C # in production? > >> what if you have messages in the queue and stops the client? > >> > >> update, if I want to use: > >> connection.ExceptionListener += new ExceptionListener(OnException); > >> to detect close conection (AMS restart) I can't use > >> 'consumer.prefetchSize=0.'! > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > -- Tim Bish http://fusesource.com http://timbish.blogspot.com/
