Just for grins, I threw your cfg file into our 5.3 testbed and sure enough,
we got the OOMs; I pumped 200k messages with each being 2k in size. FWIW,
taking this out of the cfg file made things run a lot better.
<systemUsage>
<systemUsage sendFailIfNoSpace="true">
</systemUsage>
</systemUsage>
With the above taken out of the cfg file, I was able to pump 400k messages
into the broker, no OOMs and memory utilization looked much better. I also
gave a fully-defined systemUsage a try and that also appeared to do the
trick.
<systemUsage>
<systemUsage>
<memoryUsage>
<memoryUsage limit="100 mb"/>
</memoryUsage>
<storeUsage>
<storeUsage limit="1 gb" name="foo"/>
</storeUsage>
<tempUsage>
<tempUsage limit="100 mb"/>
</tempUsage>
</systemUsage>
</systemUsage>
So may be worth giving it a whirl if you can't scoot over to the trunk and
ride Rob's patch.
Joe
Daniel Kluesing-2 wrote:
>
> I tried the suggestion of going with the default cursor, but I still get
> OOM errors. I've included my full config file below, I think I'm running
> fairly vanilla/default.
>
> After about 350k persistent messages, the logs start to look like:
>
> INFO | Slow KahaDB access: Journal append took: 10 ms, Index update took
> 3118 ms
> INFO | Slow KahaDB access: Journal append took: 0 ms, Index update took
> 5118 ms
> INFO | Slow KahaDB access: Journal append took: 0 ms, Index update took
> 2736 ms
> INFO | Slow KahaDB access: Journal append took: 0 ms, Index update took
> 2945 ms
> INFO | Slow KahaDB access: Journal append took: 33 ms, Index update took
> 2654 ms
> INFO | Slow KahaDB access: Journal append took: 82 ms, Index update took
> 3174 ms
> INFO | Slow KahaDB access: Journal append took: 1 ms, Index update took
> 5891 ms
> INFO | Slow KahaDB access: Journal append took: 0 ms, Index update took
> 2906 ms
> INFO | Slow KahaDB access: Journal append took: 60 ms, Index update took
> 7619 ms
> Exception in thread "InactivityMonitor WriteCheck"
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
> at java.util.jar.Attributes.read(Attributes.java:377)
> at java.util.jar.Manifest.read(Manifest.java:182)
> at java.util.jar.Manifest.<init>(Manifest.java:52)
> at
> java.util.jar.JarFile.getManifestFromReference(JarFile.java:165)
> at java.util.jar.JarFile.getManifest(JarFile.java:146)
> at
> sun.misc.URLClassPath$JarLoader$2.getManifest(URLClassPath.java:693)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:221)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:56)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:251)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:319)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.writeCheck(InactivityMonitor.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor$2.run(InactivityMonitor.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.thread.SchedulerTimerTask.run(SchedulerTimerTask.java:33)
> at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:512)
> at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:462)
>
> Config file:
>
> <beans
> xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
> xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core.xsd";>
>
> <bean
> class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer">
> <property name="locations">
>
> <value>file:${activemq.base}/conf/credentials.properties</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
>
> <broker xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
> brokerName="sub01chi" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data">
>
> <managementContext>
> <managementContext createConnector="true"/>
> </managementContext>
>
> <persistenceAdapter>
> <kahaDB directory="${activemq.base}/data/kahadb"/>
> </persistenceAdapter>
>
> <destinationPolicy>
> <policyMap>
> <policyEntries>
> <policyEntry queue="P>"
> producerFlowControl="true"
> memoryLimit="10mb"></policyEntry>
> </policyEntries>
> </policyMap>
> </destinationPolicy>
> <systemUsage>
> <systemUsage sendFailIfNoSpace="true">
> </systemUsage>
> </systemUsage>
> <transportConnectors>
> <transportConnector name="openwire"
> uri="tcp://0.0.0.0:61616"/>
> </transportConnectors>
> </broker>
> <import resource="jetty.xml"/>
> </beans>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 10:42 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time
>
>
> On 18 Jan 2010, at 22:14, Daniel Kluesing wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running the 5.3 release as a standalone broker. In one case, a
>> producer is running without a consumer, producing small, persistent
>> messages, with the FileCursor pendingQueuePolicy (per
>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2512)
>> option and flow control memoryLimit set to 100mb for the queue in
>> question. (Through a policy entry)
>>
>> As the queue grows above 300k messages, KahaDB indexing starts
>> climbing above 1 second. At around 350k messages, the indexing is
>> taking over 8 seconds. At this point, I start getting java out of
>> heap space errors in essentially random parts of the code. After a
>> while, the producers timeout with a channel inactive for too long
>> error, and the entire broker basically wedges itself. At this point,
>> consumers are generally unable to bind to the broker quitting with
>> timeout errors. When they can connect, consuming a single message
>> triggers an index re-build, which takes 2-8seconds. Turning on
>> verbose garbage collection, the jvm is collecting like mad but
>> reclaiming no space.
>>
>> If I restart the broker, it comes back up, I can consume the old
>> messages, and can handle another 350k messages until it wedges.
>>
>> I can reproduce under both default gc and incremental gc.
>>
>> Two questions:
>> - It seems like someone is holding onto a handle to the messages
>> after they have been persisted to disk - is this a known issue?
>> Should I open a JIRA for it? (Or is there another explanation?)
>>
>> - Is there any documentation about the internals of KahaDB - the
>> kind of indices etc? I'd like to get a better understanding of the
>> index performance and in general how KahaDB compares to something
>> like BerkeleyDB.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> There's is some confusion over naming of our persistence options that
> doesn't help. There is Kaha - which uses multiple log files and a Hash
> based index - this is currently used by the FileCursor - whilst KahaDB
> is a newer implementation, which is more robust and typically uses a
> BTreeIndex. There is currently a new implementation of the Filecursor
> btw - but that's a different matter. You can't currently configure the
> HashIndex via the FileCursor - but it looks like this is the problem
> you are encountering - as it looks like you need to increase the max
> hash buckets.
>
>
> So I would recommend the following
> 1. Use the default pendingQueuePolicy (which only uses a FileCursor
> for non-persistent messages - and uses the underlying database for
> persistent messages
> 2. Try KahaDB - which - with the BTreeIndex - will not hit the
> problems you are seeing with the Filecursor
>
> or - increase the maximum number of hash buckets for the FileCursor
> index - by setting a Java system property - maximumCapacity to 65536
> (the default is 16384)
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
>
> http://twitter.com/rajdavies
> I work here: http://fusesource.com
> My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
> I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/OOM-with-high-KahaDB-index-time-tp27217704p27264475.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
