Thanks. I' was under the same opinion, but the question really boils down to if information about the state (i.e what was the last message consumed) a certain subscriber is relayed across to other brokers in the network.
Say, if a subscriber with ClientID_A connects to broker A, and then at a later point connects to broker B..will broker B treat this as a new subscriber (consumer) and resend all messages or would it have information about this client from broker A? I've been able to find a reference to a similar problem in this post here - http://old.nabble.com/Receiving-old-messages-on-durable-topics-after-application-restart-using-ActiveMQ-two-node-cluster-td26230816.html At the very end, there is a suggestion to use virtual topics. Just interested in knowing if would that work? honeybun wrote: > > I've tested a similar configuration with two bi-directional > networkConnectors. I think the short answer is a network of brokers > behaves just like a single broker without you having to worry about it. > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers-using-Durable-Topics-tp27311079p27358901.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
