Like I said, this issue occurred with my app but in SimpleProducer.cpp
sample too. If you take SimpleProducer.cpp and put DeliverMode flag to
PERSISTENT (instead of NON_PERSISTENT).
==3085== 160 bytes in 20 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 27 of 40
==3085== at 0x40253C5: operator new(unsigned int)
(vg_replace_malloc.c:214)
==3085== by 0x4313A16:
activemq::core::ActiveMQSession::send(cms::Message*,
activemq::core::ActiveMQProducer*, activemq::util::Usage*) (Pointer.h:45)
==3085== by 0x430843E:
activemq::core::ActiveMQProducer::send(cms::Destination const*,
cms::Message*, int, int, long long) (ActiveMQProducer.cpp:197)
==3085== by 0x43065F6:
activemq::core::ActiveMQProducer::send(cms::Destination const*,
cms::Message*) (ActiveMQProducer.cpp:134)
==3085== by 0x43074FA:
activemq::core::ActiveMQProducer::send(cms::Message*)
(ActiveMQProducer.cpp:102)
==3085== by 0x8049F4D: SimpleProducer::run() (prueba.cpp:126)
==3085== by 0x804928A: main (prueba.cpp:227)
==3085== LEAK SUMMARY:
==3085== definitely lost: 7,280 bytes in 40 blocks
==3085== indirectly lost: 10,406 bytes in 468 blocks
==3085== possibly lost: 784 bytes in 6 blocks
==3085== still reachable: 28 bytes in 1 blocks
==3085== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
Is in the producer->send() call... but I dont know if I've some mistake, or
if a put PERSISTENT, i need to do something else... i've tried different
ackwnoledge methods, but i've still loosing memory.
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 01:35 -0800, opernas wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I was making test with activemq-cms and persistent messages, and I saw
>> that
>> my memory consumption was increasing for every each message that I send.
>> The
>> same example with NON_PERSISTENT delivery mode flag doesn't loose any
>> memory.
>> Valgrind with the example of your web and PERSISTENT flag on:
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Finished with the example.
>>
>> =====================================================
>>
>> ==6141==
>>
>> ==6141== HEAP SUMMARY:
>> ==6141== in use at exit: 1,750,846 bytes in 50,014 blocks
>> ==6141== total heap usage: 317,727 allocs, 267,713 frees, 31,314,995
>> bytes
>> allocated
>> ==6141==
>> ==6141== LEAK SUMMARY:
>> ==6141== definitely lost: 677,572 bytes in 3,999 blocks
>> ==6141== indirectly lost: 1,071,561 bytes in 45,977 blocks
>> ==6141== possibly lost: 1,685 bytes in 37 blocks
>> ==6141== still reachable: 28 bytes in 1 blocks
>> ==6141== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>> ==6141== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
>> ==6141==
>> ==6141== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
>> ==6141== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 37 from 6)
>>
>>
>> Perhaps it's something about the acknowledge?
>>
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>
> What version are you using of ActiveMQ-CPP ?
>
> Can you provide a sample app that demonstrates this issue?
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Tim Bish
>
> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
> Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/tabish121
> My Blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP%3A-memory-leak-with-persistent-sendings--tp27716173p27717254.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
