Thanks for the trick/tips.

I will try but my previous remark is always the same. The system is static
and need an intervention to change priority when a slow consumer is
detected.

Kind regards,

Charles


Joe Fernandez wrote:
> 
> Try using consumer prioritization. 
> 
> http://activemq.apache.org/consumer-priority.html
> 
> From the web page - 
> 
> "The way it works is that the broker will simply order any queue consumers
> according to their priorities and send messages to the highest priority
> consumers first. Once a particular consumer has its prefetch buffer filled
> up, the broker will begin to dispatch messages to consumers of lower
> priorities."
> 
> I have tried this across a 2-broker NoB and it seems to work fine. 
> 
> So what you want to do is assign the fast consumer on  br2 a higher
> priority. Messages will then be dispatched to the fast consumer until its
> prefetch limit has been reached (i.e., the fast consumer becomes a slow
> consumer); at which time, the messages will then begin flowing to the
> low-priority consumer on br1. Messages will again flow to the fast
> consumer as soon as it addresses its prefetch limit issue.     
> 
> Joe
> ActiveMQ Ref Guide - http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
> 
> 
> cmoulliard wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I would like to know if it is possible when we have created a bridge
>> between two brokers (br1 and br2) and where we have a fast consumer
>> connected on br2 and a slow on br1 that the broker br1 send more messages
>> to the br2 instead to balance them equitably ?
>> 
>> For the moment, If I produce 500 messages, 250 messages will be consumed
>> by the fast consumer and 250 by the slow. Normally the fast consumer
>> should receive more messages !!
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Charles 
>> 
> 
> 


-----
Charles Moulliard
SOA Architect

My Blog :  http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/ http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/  
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/How-can-avoid-that-the-broker-master-loadbalance-messages-equitably-between-two-brokers---tp28692489p28730780.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to