Hi guys, I'm investigating ActiveMQ for a trial in the following scenario: 1. End-customer own ships/planes/boats (3-5 vessels) that are linked to the HQ on land via Satellite 2. Satellite provisions on-demand datalink 3. Data will need to be sync between HQ and vessels on a regular basis 4. Satellite data charges are relatively expensive, so we need to try to reduce it
I am thinking of 1. 1 ActiveMQ per vessel, 1 ActiveMQ at HQ (HA/failover can be implemented later) 2. Data to be sync-ed to the other side will be placed on the local ActiveMQ instance 3. HQ will access data on ship by connecting to ActiveMQ instance on vessel 4. Vessel will access data at HQ by connecting to ActiveMQ instance there 5. Configuring ActiveMQs to use UDP instead of TCP to save on comms overhead (?) Would this approach work? 1. Will using UDP help to reduce the comms overhead? Each network packet sent (whether full or not) is charged 2. Should I skip the main MQ instance in the HQ? Any advice / suggestions and criticisms are welcomed and needed. Thank you very much... :))) -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/MQ-architecture-query-tp3044196p3044196.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
