We use an embedded broker without any problem at work. But we are still
on 5.4.2 because of this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3276
Bye,
Norman
Am 27.06.2011 15:45, schrieb Gary Tully:
sure it is, an embedded broker is no different from a standalone
broker w.r.t to broker functionality and stability. The only caveat is
that its lifecycle is determined by the application that hosts it, but
it will recovery its logs just fine in the event of an abortive
failure.
What sort of concerns do you have?
On 27 June 2011 14:38, Vijay<vijayender.band...@gmail.com> wrote:
Can anyone share their thoughts on this?
ActiveMQ Inventors pls. have your say.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Anyone-using-Embedded-Broker-in-production-tp3621799p3627740.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
