Do you intend on adding additional transports to Apollo then? Or will it "inherit" ActiveMQ's additional transports when folded back in?
On 7 July 2011 16:40, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote: > No. This is just a new messaging engine with a different > architecture. It has a reduced set of features when compared to > ActiveMQ 5.x. The hopes are that it will eventually contain enough > features to become the engine that drives the next major revision of > ActiveMQ. This is a little similar to when Tomcat developed the > Catalina engine. > > So, eventually Apollo will be folded back into the main ActiveMQ > project. It's being released independently with a reduced feature set > to encourage early adoption and help solidify and make it more robust > by the time the ActiveMQ project uses it for ActiveMQ 6.0. > > Regards, > Hiram > > FuseSource > Web: http://fusesource.com/ > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Is ActiveMQ to be discontinued in favour of this in the future? > > > > On 7 July 2011 16:26, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote: > > > >> The Apache ActiveMQ Project is pleased to announce the availability of > >> Apollo 1.0 Beta 4. ActiveMQ Apollo is a faster, more reliable, easier > >> to maintain messaging broker built from the foundations of the > >> original ActiveMQ. It is focused on being the fastest most reliable > >> STOMP 1.1 and 1.0 server available. > >> > >> Read more about the release at: > >> http://activemq.apache.org/apollo/blog/releases/release-1-0-beta4.html > >> > >> Regards, > >> Hiram > >> > >> FuseSource > >> Web: http://fusesource.com/ > >> > > >
