Hi, On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Mohit Anchlia <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! Slightly different question. Is there any reason why one > shouldn't use vm transport?
Often it is sensible to have the broker as an external running application, so it is available for procuders / consumers in other processes even if your application is down. In my case, ActiveMQ is the messaging middleware for several processes communicating with each other. I wouldn't want it to go down if one of the parts goes of the entire application goes down. Best regards, Martin
