quick question about the network connectors/bridge and failover. seems the static discover is sufficient to handle failovers as it will poll the slave in a master/slave network of brokers. seems the polling is configurable also. is there any reason to use the failover() mechanism when establishing a network of brokers pointing to a master/slave? Torsten mentions such a thing in his blog for the purposes of reducing the warn logging when the polling to the slave times out. are there any drawbacks to using it for static discovery?
----- http://www.christianposta.com -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NetworkConnectors-and-Master-Slave-failvoer-tp4599619.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
