Have you seen this simple select *SELECT * FROM ACTIVEMQ_LOCK WHERE ID=1* working for MS SQL Server? It doesn't for me in terms of master/slave synchronization (i.e. slave is not blocked on this select) unless I do something like this *SELECT * FROM ACTIVEMQ_LOCK(rowlock, updlock, REPEATABLEREAD) WHERE ID=1*...
If anyone have successful implementation of MASTER/SLAVE configuration for MS MSQL Server, please share details... -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-TransactDatabaseLocker-s-lock-statement-tp4653552p4653773.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
