On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Christian Posta
<christian.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Enqueue count = number of messages sent to the queue
> Dequeue count = number of messages ack'd by the consumer
> Inflight count = number of messages sent to consumer's session (and are not
> ack'd by consumer)
> Dispatch count = messages sent to the consumer (dequeue + inflight)
>

Nice summary. Christian I think you should add that as a FAQ
http://activemq.apache.org/faq


> I asked about the async sends because the producer flow control you hit was
> the kind that will block the entire connection (instead of just blocking
> that one producer).
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Thanks again! Is the dispatch queue size the one that relates to what's
>> held in memory?
>>
>> We are using mule and the endpoint has no transactions configured. What did
>> you mean by forcing async?
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Christian Posta
>> <christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> > Correct. The memoryUsage is increased when messages are held in memory.
>> > This happens when messages are paged in from the store. They are then
>> > dispatched to consumers and held until the consumer acks.
>> >
>> > In your case looks like a particular destination (eventsEndpoint) is
>> > filling up somehow. Can you look in JMX and see how many enqueued,
>> > dispatched, dequeued, inflight etc? Also check to see how many
>> > subscriptions to that destination, and see what those dispatch-counter
>> and
>> > dispatch queue size looks like.
>> >
>> > BTW any chance you're sending (producers) using a transaction, or forcing
>> > sends to be async?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > So if I understand correctly I shouldn't be seeing this behaviour
>> unless
>> > > something is being held in memory. We ack immediately so I am kind of
>> > > wondering what might be going on here. Is there a way to find out what
>> > > might be happening here?
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Christian Posta
>> > > <christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > What info can you provide about how clients are consuming from the
>> > > queues?
>> > > > Any chance there are a bunch of messages "inflight" which haven't
>> been
>> > > > ack'd by the consumer?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Mohit Anchlia <
>> mohitanch...@gmail.com
>> > > > >wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I see these messages being logged. Queues are setup to use
>> persistent
>> > > > > store. I am wondering what's causing this messages to get blocked.
>> I
>> > > see
>> > > > > there is a memoryLimit but if I am using persistent=true then
>> should
>> > > this
>> > > > > be the desired behaviour?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2013-01-02 05:06:13,388 | INFO |
>> > > > > Usage(default:memory:queue://eventsEndpoint:memory)
>> percentUsage=0%,
>> > > > > usage=0, limit=20971520,
>> > > > > percentUsageMinDelta=1%;Parent:Usage(default:memory)
>> > percentUsage=106%,
>> > > > > usage=22366029, limit=20971520, percentUsageMinDelta=1%: Usage
>> > Manager
>> > > > > Memory Limit reached. Producer
>> > > > > (ID:pfdamq301.ie.net-54582-1351809386355-2:1:1:1) stopped to
>> prevent
>> > > > > flooding queue://eventsEndpoint. See
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >    <broker xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
>> > > > > brokerName="static-broker1" persistent="true"
>> > > > > dataDirectory="${activemq.data}">
>> > > > >
>> > > > >         <!-- Destination specific policies using destination names
>> or
>> > > > > wildcards -->
>> > > > >         <destinationPolicy>
>> > > > >             <policyMap>
>> > > > >                 <policyEntries>
>> > > > >                     <policyEntry queue=">"
>> producerFlowControl="true"
>> > > > > memoryLimit="20mb">
>> > > > >                         <deadLetterStrategy>
>> > > > >                           <individualDeadLetterStrategy
>> > > > queuePrefix="DLQ."
>> > > > > useQueueForQueueMessages="true" />
>> > > > >                         </deadLetterStrategy>
>> > > > >                     </policyEntry>
>> > > > >                     <policyEntry topic=">"
>> producerFlowControl="true"
>> > > > > memoryLimit="20mb">
>> > > > >                     </policyEntry>
>> > > > >                 </policyEntries>
>> > > > >             </policyMap>
>> > > > >         </destinationPolicy>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >         <!-- Use the following to configure how ActiveMQ is exposed
>> > in
>> > > > JMX
>> > > > > -->
>> > > > >         <managementContext>
>> > > > >             <managementContext createConnector="true"/>
>> > > > >         </managementContext>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > *Christian Posta*
>> > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> > > > twitter: @christianposta
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Christian Posta*
>> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> > twitter: @christianposta
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> twitter: @christianposta



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen

Reply via email to