I would think you'd be okay.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Paul Gale <paul.n.g...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Christian. > > The reason I ask is that I am building ActiveMQ locally whilst > incorporating the patch for AMQ-4393 at the same time. I noticed that all > of the resultant jars (not just activemq-web) were slightly different in > size than the distro jars. I wasn't sure how concerned I should be about > that. > > I built my locally copy with 1.6.0_45. That should be ok, right? > > Thanks, > Paul > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Christian Posta > <christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > Paul, > > > > Looks like Build-Jdk: 1.6.0_37 > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Paul Gale <paul.n.g...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > After reading the build instructions for ActiveMQ here: > > > http://activemq.apache.org/building.html > > > > > > I'm wondering what was the _exact_ version of Java that was used to > build > > > the release version of 5.8.0? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Christian Posta* > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > > twitter: @christianposta > > > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
