Hi, Thank you for the reply. Yes, we are using a URI like this: failover:(tcp://192.168.0.195:61616,tcp://192.168.0.196:61616)?initialReconnectDelay=100&trackMessages=true
Still, I didn't understand your answer. Should using failover have taken care of our problem (the duplicate messages that we receive)? Or is it normal that the client receives duplicates when it fails over to the other broker (given the warning that we saw in the logs) ? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Master-Slave-failover-behaviour-tp4673622p4673626.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
