i encourage you to take a look at and understand all of the options, but only apply them once you've seen proof (through benchmarking and observations) that they help your situation and solve the bottlenecks you've observed. attempting to tune a broker for performance by switching on options "because they increase performance" is going to land you and your performance in more trouble unless you've proof that what you're doing is alleviating what you're expecting (trust me.. i've been there done that)
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Yin Wang <suon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes,that help performance but once broker gets restarted,it will take > longer time to complete index recovery. > Here is a guide that may help you to tune performance, > https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_A-MQ/6.0/html/Tuning_Guide/files/PersTuning-KahaDB.html > > > 2014-02-13 19:49 GMT+08:00 khandelwalanuj <khandelwal.anu...@gmail.com>: > >> Hey, >> >> I want to increase checkpoint interval of kahadb to store the cache on >> disk. >> By doing this can i increase my broker performance? >> >> Does it has any side effect on broker or any other issues ? >> >> Thanks, >> Anuj >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/increase-Checkpoint-interval-tp4677931.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> -- Christian Posta http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
