Hi, If you don’t want to touch the message body, using the JMS Bridge should be fine. If you want to route the message based on the message content or route the message with other transport protocol, using Apache Camel is a better choice.
-- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On July 26, 2014 at 9:44:59 AM, pminearo ([email protected]) wrote: > I have a JMS Bridge set up between to ActiveMQ (5.10) Queues. We are running > into an issue with the Bridge dropping the connections. I have been digging > around to find a fix, and I keep running into use Camel Routes. > > Besides the 3 reasons listed here: > http://activemq.apache.org/jms-to-jms-bridge.html > > > Why does everyone just assume the fix is "Use Camel Routes"? Is the JMS > Bridge functionality no longer supported? Are there too many problems with > it? > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-Bridge-vs-Camel-tp4683688.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
