Ah-ha! you're invoking on line 51 outside of a transaction https://github.com/myfear/wildflyamq/blob/master/wildflymdb-ejb/src/main/java/net/eisele/ee7/mdb/MessageProducer.java#L51 I know you'll want to say you annotated it transactional, but that doesn't work when you're calling it locally. Can you try using a delegate?
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Markus Eisele <eisele.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > implicitly ... it is done in the EJB container ... > > https://github.com/myfear/wildflyamq/blob/master/wildflymdb-ejb/src/main/java/net/eisele/ee7/mdb/MessageProducer.java > > Thanks, > Markus > > On 8 September 2014 19:50, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Markus, > > > > Based on your stack trace, looks like HornetQ's bridge isn't > participating > > in a transaction. Are you explicitly or implicitly starting one? > > > > John > > > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Markus Eisele <eisele.mar...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've been looking into configuring WildFly 8.1 with ActiveMQ Resource > >> Adapter lately and got everything up and running. > >> I could produce messages from Java EE components (aka EJBs via > >> JMS-Bridge) and also could consume messages via MDBs. > >> During sending messages via the bridge I encountered a warning I can't > >> get rid of. > >> Appreciate any ideas/hints. > >> > >> HQ122009: JMS Bridge failed to send + acknowledge batch > >> https://gist.github.com/myfear/03c0937a57aa3ad9906d > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Markus > >> >
