I believe I've seen someone (I'd guess Tim or Art off the top of my head) give rough performance comparisons between JDBC, KahaDB, and LevelDB, but searching my email quickly I couldn't find it. So I'll just say that the consensus is that you'll get the best performance from LevelDB, then KahaDB, and JDBC will have the worst performance. I can't quantify how much better the performance is between the different types (though maybe someone else can or maybe you can find that email I think I remember seeing), but I've never seen anyone recommend choosing JDBC over KahaDB so I'd say you're wasting your time by looking into it. Hi,
We are using ActiveMQ-5.11 with kahadb shared storage. I just want to understand the aspects of using JDBC for persistence store. I know that kahadb is the default database for ActiveMQ and JDBC was used with old versions. Does ActiveMQ gods suggest using JDBC in ActiveMQ ? Thanks, Anuj -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JDBC-for-ActiveMQ-5-11-tp4696749.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.