On 11/26/2015 08:24 AM, spamtrap wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:06:15 -0500, Timothy Bish
> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish
>>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish
>>>>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish
>>>>>>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have the following code:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> cms::Message *pMessage;
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> std::vector<std::string> propertyNames = pMessage->getPropertyNames();
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> According to valgrind this leaks memory. propertyNames is on the
>>>>>>>>> stack BTW.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ==27758== 50,039,920 (289,968 direct, 49,749,952 indirect) bytes in
>>>>>>>>> 6,041 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 383 of 384
>>>>>>>>> ==27758== at 0x4A075FC: operator new(unsigned long)
>>>>>>>>> (vg_replace_malloc.c:298)
>>>>>>>>> ==27758== by 0x5F77EF9: decaf::util::StlMap<std::string,
>>>>>>>>> activemq::util::PrimitiveValueNode,
>>>>>>>>> decaf::util::comparators::Less<std::string> >::keySet() const
>>>>>>>>> (StlMap.h:866)
>>>>>>>>> ==27758== by 0x5C3799E:
>>>>>>>>> activemq::commands::ActiveMQMessageTemplate<cms::BytesMessage>::getPropertyNames()
>>>>>>>>> const (ActiveMQMessageTemplate.h:109)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >From a quick code inspection I don't see any case where a leak can
>>>>>>>> occur. If you can add a test case to the existing set of unit tests
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> the Message objects to reproduce the valgrind complaint I will look
>>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try adding something to
>>>>>>>> src/test/activemq/commands/ActiveMQMessageTest.h/cpp
>>>>>>> Where are the binaries placed for the test programs? I can't seem to
>>>>>>> find them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Depends on how you are building them, what is the environment and build
>>>>>> process?
>>>>> Linux 64 bit. I've run:
>>>>>
>>>>> configure ....
>>>>> make
>>>>> make install
>>>>> make check
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> So on Linux the autotools the build process will place the executables
>>>> in the directory that map to the application being created.
>>>>
>>>> So for instance if you want to build the unit tests the executable is in
>>>>
>>>> ./src/test/ and is called activemq-test I believe.
>>>>
>>>> I generally use a build folder to keep the source and intermediate files
>>>> separate, to test and check for leaks I use a process something like the
>>>> following.
>>>>
>>>> cd activemq-cpp
>>>> mkdir ./build
>>>> ./autogen.sh
>>> I get this:
>>> "configure.ac:122: ' is not a type"
>>> Is this a problem?
>>>
>>>> cd build
>>>> ../configure --enable-shared=no CXXFLAGS="-g -O0"
>>>> make check -j 8
>>> "make: *** No rule to make target `check'. Stop."
>>> [There's no makefile in the build directory]
>>>
>>> make -f ../Makefile also does not work:
>>>
>>> CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh
>>> /home/me/activemq/activemq-cpp-library-3.9.0/config/missing --run
>>> aclocal-1.11 -I m4
>>> aclocal-1.11: `configure.ac' or `configure.in' is required
>>> make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1
>>>
>>>
>>>> ./src/test/activemq-test
>>> There's no file of this name anywhere.
>>>
>> If you are having trouble try clone the git repo and working with that,
>> I built that code yesterday without issue.
> I've just tried this and I get the same result. I notice that 'make
> check' does not even attempt to build anything in src/test. I wonder
> if it's because cppunit is not installed in a 'standard' location?
>
>
>
That could be an issue, you'd need to debug it on your side to find out
for sure.
--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
