Thank you for that information it cleared up a lot of things, I was a little hesitant on implementing Artemis in a production environment.
Have an awesome day! John -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Shannon <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> Reply-To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org> Date: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 3:29 PM To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org> Subject: [!!Mass Mail]Re: Regarding replicated DB store solutions >You probably figured this out but to be clear in my previous message in >the >first paragraph I meant to say that LevelDB was "intended to be the follow >on to KahaDB", and not "was intended to be the follow on to ActiveMQ" as >it >currently states. > >On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Christopher Shannon < >christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The issue with the current LevelDB implementation is that it is not >> stable. There have been numerous bugs reported against it that have not >> been fixed including corruption problems so it is not really usable in a >> production environment. Originally it was intended to be the follow on >>to >> ActiveMQ but it has basically been abandoned as there hasn't been anyone >> who has shown any interest the past couple of years to fix it up so it >>has >> been deprecated. >> >> The link you have found is old as originally replication support was >> planned for KahaDB but that was migrated to LevelDB instead and KahaDB >>does >> not currently have replication. However if you are ok with a shared >>file >> system solution for high availability then you can use KahaDB. >> http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html . >> >> If you are interested in replication support I would take a look at >> Artemis (https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/), which you alluded to by >> mentioning the ActiveMQ sibling project. Artemis supports replication >>and >> is currently under heavy development with the goal to ultimately have it >> replace the current 5.x broker if/when the community decides it is >>ready. >> So I would give it a shot and see if it works for you if you need a >> replication. I doubt that there will ever be replication added to >>KahaDB >> as most of the active development is going towards Artemis at this >>point. >> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:15 AM, JR John Roach (5298) <jro...@ag.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We need a high availability solution. To this extent I did some >>>research >>> on the usage of ActiveMQ. >>> >>> According to this documentation (http://activemq.apache.org/re >>> plicated-leveldb-store.html) LevelDB store is no longer supported. >>> Wasn¹t LevelDB newer DB solution? Wasn¹t it going to replace KahaDB? >>> >>> According to this documentation (http://activemq.apache.org/ka >>> hadb-master-slave.html) KahaDB replication is not currently supported. >>> Will it ever be? Also it looks like the documentation is broken, could >>>it >>> be fixed? >>> >>> If replicated DB is not supported what is the supported high >>>availability >>> solution that ActiveMQ has that can; >>> >>> * Support multiple slaves >>> * Replication of queues >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Could the ActiveMQ sibling be the solution? >>> >>> Thank you for any information you can provide. >>> >>> >>> >>
