Hi Tim, thanks for clarifying this. I may have expressed it not precisely in my answer: the problem exactly was that for the broker1_broker2_simplex bridge, when sending messages to a queue which is initially only known by broker 2 (because only there a consumer exists for this queue), sometimes doesn't go 1 -> 2, but goes 1 -> 3. Which is clear, since for a static bridge, broker 1 doesn't know which broker has the consumer, and since the includes conatin a wildcard, it will just use round robin to send the messages to the connected brokers.
So it's not about the duplex=false, but it's about the static bridge. When using dynamic bridges as proposed, everything works fine. Regards, Jochen -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Network-of-brokers-problem-with-duplex-false-for-static-bridges-tp4727986p4728318.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.