Yes Artemis is being actively developed and is the primary focus while the old ActiveMQ 5.x line is mostly just maintenance mode at this point. The intention is that Artemis is the successor regardless of whether it keeps the name Artemis or is renamed at some point. In my opinion if you are starting a new project I would use Artemis as that is where all current development focus is and what will be actively maintained and improved in the future.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com > wrote: > ...there's a lot of activity on Artemis with new code and features > added each day. > > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 3:20 AM, kkott00 <kkot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As it have been reported before here > > <http://activemq.apache.org/new-features-in-60.html> Artemis become > > successor of ActiveMQ line. Is it still actual? Is there migration plan > > expected? Should I prefer Artemis for new projects than ActiveMQ? > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/ActiveMQ-6-0-Will-ActiveMQ-6-0-will-be-released- > on-Artemis-codebase-tp4728543.html > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >
