On 07/31/2017 06:41 AM, Tamas1 wrote:
Thank you for your reply. The library in the application has been replaced to
the latest 3.9.4 Release. The behaviour is different but it didn't resolve
the problem.

I used the following connection URL:
failover:(tcp://amq01:61616?soKeepAlive=true,tcp://amq02:61616?soKeepAlive=true)?randomize=true&backup=true

There are 160-160 application processes (all are the same) on two different
hosts (host01/02).

I executed the following tests.

Test 1
The expected number of application connections should be 160-160 from each
host to amq01-amq02.
This number was 158/160 to amq01/02 on host01 and 144/160 to amq01/02 on
host02. The application instances that were connected to amq02 didn't have
backup connections to amq01.

Test 2
I shut down amq01. Result was 160 connections from both host to amq02 as
expected.

Test 3
I restarted amq01 and (after amq01 fully started) I shut down amq02. Result
was 158/144 connections from host01/02 to amq01.
The application instances that didn't initially have backup connections to
amq01 didn't fail over to amq01. They didn't have connections to any
ActiveMQ instance. I suppose they were attempting to reconnect to amq02 (I
didn't trace it).

Test 4
I restarted amq02. After a couple of seconds, number of connections were
158/2 from host01 and 144/16 from host02 to amq01/02.
The application instances that didn't initially have backup connections to
amq01 (only to amq02) reconnected to amq02. The original number of
connections were 160-160 to amq02 which was no more the case.


I repeated the test and I restarted everything not only once but the
behaviour didn't change.

I would appreciate your feedback.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP-backup-true-does-not-work-with-failover-transport-tp4728967p4729057.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I'd recommend leaving backup=true out of the URI and run without it, that should resolve the issue


--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to