> Is it fine to tear down and create a new connection on every failure? I would expect that a broker failure requiring you to connect to a different broker would be a relatively rare event. The core JMS client has functionality to transparently reconnect to the same broker in the case of some kind of network connection failure where the broker is still running so you shouldn't need to do anything in your application to deal with that situation. How often do you see brokers failing?
Justin On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:31 PM artemisn00b <prahlad.mi...@nokia.com> wrote: > >Why are you using 3 VMs in the first place? Is that what you were using > before with the 5.x broker? > > The message broker is a small part of a large product. So, unfortunately > due > to the architecture, we HAVE to use 3 artemis servers, and can't do > without. > Using 3 brokers is not for higher throughput. > > >Even if you do set up HA you'll still need to account for the situation > were the backup fails (as you mentioned) and you need to tear down the > connection and create a new one. What specifically about your solution do > you not think is robust? > > Is it fine to tear down and create a new connection on every failure? It > works, but I'm not so experienced to understand and assess if it is robust. > It just looks a little makeshift, to me, but again, I'm not sure, so I > asked > you! :) > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html >
