To confirm, are you saying that you're trying to use one Oracle database for message storage and a different Oracle database for locking?
If so, would you mind explaining why you're not just using a single database for both purposes? I have no idea if the configuration I think you're describing is possible in the current implementation, but I could imagine someone saying that there was no need to support it because no one would ever use it since they'd never want multiple SQL databases vs. using a single database for both purposes, and I'd like to understand why that assumption is a bad one. Tim On Sun, Jul 11, 2021, 7:23 PM Vince Cox <v...@perforce.com> wrote: > Using ActiveMQ 5.15.x & 5.16.x I have been unable to get both the locking > mechanism and the data on 2 unique data sources (using oracle)? Having > failover issues if they share the connection pool and data source. Is > anyone aware of how to do this? Is this something ActiveMQ should be able > to do? > > Thank you. > > Vince > > > This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If > you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any > attachments and notify us immediately. > >
