>> Correct me if I'm wrong on my understandings. My proposal was to not
> store hashes (or plaintext passwords) in b) type records.

> As far as I can tell, you believe that "surviving records" and "operational 
> records" are two fundamentally different things which is, in fact, not the 
> case. As I noted in a previous email, the "data print" command simply lists 
> the "surviving records" as a convenience for readability. The only kinds of 
> records which *actually exist* in the journal are the "operational records."

> To use an analogy, surviving records are to operational records as net income 
> is to gross income.

I see. It still beyond me how this kind of data structure actually works during 
authentication on every connection then, but you probably can ignore what I 
said earlier regarding hashes.

> If that happens you can run the "data compact" command to remove any stale 
> operational records that contain the plaintext password(s).

I agree, however to actually *know* that you have to run "data compact" one 
must know how journal works. But I guess that's another question for another 
day.

Thank you for detailed explanations!

-- 
   Vilius

Reply via email to