Thank you Justin.  It's just now becoming apparent to me that the heartbeating 
mechanism is built into the client connection, i.e., I don't have to do 
anything on the on-heartbeat event.  Doh!

>From what I've read I need to create a Connection12 to make all this go.  So 
>now I will proceed to try to get all this working.

Thank you for your help and your patience.

Regards,

Rich Bergmann
________________________________
From: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2022 11:01 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org <users@activemq.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [External] - Re: How to avoid AMQ229014 TTL "dump" for a "patient" 
Python 3 Stomp Listener

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.


Heart-beating is something that your client implementation should provide
for you automatically. You shouldn't need to send your own heart-beats
manually. The client should also provide a way to configure the
heart-beating on the initial connection so that it can send the proper
header on the CONNECT frame. Does your Python STOMP client support
heart-beating? The fact that you're not receiving any heart-beats indicates
that either your client doesn't support it or you're not configuring it
properly.


Justin


On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 9:22 AM Richard Bergmann
<rbergm...@colsa.com.invalid> wrote:

> I am set up to receive the heartbeat event on-heartbeat, but it is never
> fired.
>
> Heartbeat makes sense, and I did a bit of digging on that, but the "STOMP
> heart-beating and connection-ttl" section within
> https://usg02.safelinks.protection.office365.us/?url=https%3A%2F%2Factivemq.apache.org%2Fcomponents%2Fartemis%2Fdocumentation%2Flatest%2Fstomp.html&amp;data=05%7C01%7CRBERGMANN%40colsa.com%7Cfb348f55351b4d9d11ab08da552942cb%7C9821086b78824b43a5edb1e979bee31f%7C1%7C0%7C637915932981513562%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=dVeuxnvIg0l7YWPTv03pgLC%2FtASlTBufFl1CnK3%2BwAo%3D&amp;reserved=0
> (which  think I read maybe 50 times over the last two days?) basically sez
>
> (1) you need STOMP 1.1 or 1.2 (1.0 is the default)
> (2) you need to send a heartbeat header
> (3) you need to respond with a heartbeat
>
> But nowhere is does is specify WHAT a heartbeat message is!!!!  Yes (and
> just know), massive Googling presents me with no examples of HOW to do this.
>
> As I am using a basic STOMP Python connection (presumably 1.0), I am HAPPY
> to send unsolicited heartbeats to the broker every, say, 30 seconds, but
> I'm left wanting for just WHAT that heartbeat call is!!!!!
>
> Sorry, kinda frustrated here . . .
> ________________________________
> From: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2022 9:50 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org <users@activemq.apache.org>
> Subject: [External] - Re: How to avoid AMQ229014 TTL "dump" for a
> "patient" Python 3 Stomp Listener
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
> > Is there a more acceptable way to alert the broker that the listener is
> still alive and well but just being patient?
>
> Yes. STOMP already has this via heartbeating [1]. Does your Python client
> support heartbeating? If so, are you configuring it?
>
>
> Justin
>
> [1]
> https://usg02.safelinks.protection.office365.us/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstomp.github.io%2Fstomp-specification-1.2.html%23Heart-beating&amp;data=05%7C01%7CRBERGMANN%40colsa.com%7Cfb348f55351b4d9d11ab08da552942cb%7C9821086b78824b43a5edb1e979bee31f%7C1%7C0%7C637915932981513562%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=QZ5eaXPjyaTvWi2w3YuQ0BNS%2FHvO1XZWppsysQgcAnQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 7:56 AM Richard Bergmann
> <rbergm...@colsa.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > I migrated my application from Classic to Artemis, and now my listeners
> > are being summarily disconnected by the broker on a TTL timeout.
> >
> > My use case is that I have listeners (subscribers) that are launched as a
> > service and patiently wait (could be for days!!!!) for messages to arrive
> > on a work queue.  Furthermore, the work to be done can take perhaps up to
> > an hour . . . well past the default TTL timeout of 60 seconds.  This was
> > not an issue in Classic, but certainly is in Artemis.
> >
> > My solution was to bump the STOMP acceptor timeout to something
> > stratospheric (e.g., 10,000,000,000), but this just feels . . . icky!
> >
> > I've seen a number of threads recommend doing a "connect and subscribe"
> > loop in the on-disconnect event, but I have a bad feeling about this if
> the
> > listener is working on a message that is either NACKed on the disconnect,
> > or the ACK fails because the work was completed between the disconnect
> and
> > the reconnect.  In other words, this also feels icky!
> >
> > Is there a more acceptable way to alert the broker that the listener is
> > still alive and well but just being patient?  For example, is there a
> NOOP
> > call that can be made to the broker every, say, 30 seconds, to say "I'm
> > still here!  Please don't kill me!!!"?  Since the listener may be in the
> > throes of a long-running process, I can see having the listener spawn a
> > thread that sends the "I'm alive!" message every 30 seconds, then,
> > terminate the thread on a successful shutdown.  That way the broker can
> > kill legitimately "dead" listeners by keeping the reasonable 60 second
> > timeout, but not assassinate my legitimate patient listeners.
> >
> > Thank you!  :)
> > ________________________________
> > The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments from COLSA
> > Corporation may contain company sensitive and/or proprietary information,
> > and is intended only for the named recipient to whom it was originally
> > addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
> > distribution, or copying of this e-mail or its attachments is strictly
> > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
> > sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete the e-mail and
> > any attachments.
> >
> >
> > COLSA Proprietary
> >
> ________________________________
> The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments from COLSA
> Corporation may contain company sensitive and/or proprietary information,
> and is intended only for the named recipient to whom it was originally
> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
> distribution, or copying of this e-mail or its attachments is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
> sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete the e-mail and
> any attachments.
>
>
> COLSA Proprietary
>
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments from COLSA 
Corporation may contain company sensitive and/or proprietary information, and 
is intended only for the named recipient to whom it was originally addressed. 
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, distribution, or copying 
of this e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and 
permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments.


COLSA Proprietary

Reply via email to