Hi JB

Thank you so much. Very appreciated.

Best regards
Martin



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. April 2024 07:25
An: users@activemq.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Disabled authentication ActiveMQ Classic Webapps since V6.x

H Martin

For the tracking, here's the Jira ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9477

The fix has been merged. We will move forward with the 6.1.2 release including 
this.

Thanks for the report.

Regards
JB

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:32 AM Zeissig, Martin <mzeis...@gk-software.com> 
wrote:
>
> Dear Community
>
> I have updated from ActiveMQ Classic 5.x to 6.1.1.
> Since update to 6.1.1 the API (webapps jolokia) is unprotected and can be 
> accessed without basic authentication:
>
> Example:
> http://localhost:8161/api
>
> In previous ActiveMQ Classic versions (5.x) the API was protected with 
> authentication by standard. Now in ActiveMQ Classic versions 6.x the pathspec 
> is set to *.jsp only which enables unprotected access to all webapps 
> including the API.
>
> AMQ Classic 5.x
> <bean id="securityConstraintMapping" 
> class="org.eclipse.jetty.security.ConstraintMapping">
>   <property name="constraint" ref="securityConstraint" />
>   <property name="pathSpec" 
> value="/,/api/*,*.jsp,*.html,*.js,*.css,*.png,*.gif,*.ico" /> </bean>
>
> AMQ Classic 6.x
> <bean id="securityConstraintMapping" 
> class="org.eclipse.jetty.security.ConstraintMapping">
>   <property name="constraint" ref="securityConstraint" />
>   <property name="pathSpec" value="*.jsp" /> </bean>
>
> From security perspective it looks to me like a step backward. Was the change 
> intentional or is this a bug?
>
> I recommend restricting access to root (/) to fully protect all endpoints. 
> Lower security can be setup by users manually if needed.
>
> <bean id="securityConstraintMapping" 
> class="org.eclipse.jetty.security.ConstraintMapping">
>   <property name="constraint" ref="securityConstraint" />
>   <property name="pathSpec" value="/" /> </bean>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Martin

Reply via email to