Hello all,

any luck with this?
I'm looking for someone familiar with Jolokia integration inside ActiveMQ

Thank you so much in advance



Distinti Saluti / Kind Regards
M.G.

________________________________
Da: Marco Garavello <marco.garave...@carel.com>
Inviato: lunedì 4 marzo 2024 11:30
A: users@activemq.apache.org <users@activemq.apache.org>; j...@nanthrax.net 
<j...@nanthrax.net>
Oggetto: Re: Receiving 401 Unauthorized on Jolokia API on localhost port 8161

Hello JB,

sorry to bother
I've seen in another thread you're familiar with Jolokia integration inside 
ActiveMQ
Maybe you have got an advice also for me, on this thread?

Thank you so much in advance



Distinti Saluti / Kind Regards
M.G.


Il giorno ven 23 feb 2024 alle ore 14:24 Marco Garavello 
<marco.garave...@carel.com<mailto:marco.garave...@carel.com>> ha scritto:
Hello,

anyone has an advice?
Thanks in advance


Distinti Saluti / Kind Regards
M.G.


Il giorno mer 14 feb 2024 alle ore 09:34 Marco Garavello 
<marco.garave...@carel.com<mailto:marco.garave...@carel.com>> ha scritto:
Hello,

maybe this could not be the right place where to ask similar information
Any advice regarding where to ask for support on this matter?

Thanks in advance


Distinti Saluti / Kind Regards
M.G.


Il giorno mar 6 feb 2024 alle ore 14:22 Marco Garavello 
<marco.garave...@carel.com<mailto:marco.garave...@carel.com>> ha scritto:
Hello again,

to whom reads this I propose this very fast test, as statistic and learning, 
which could help me a lot: can you please execute this command on the VM where 
your primary AMQ instance is running

"curl -v http://localhost:8161/api/jolokia";

and post here the HTTP status code you receive?


Distinti Saluti / Kind Regards
M.G.



Il giorno ven 2 feb 2024 alle ore 08:48 Marco Garavello 
<marco.garave...@carel.com<mailto:marco.garave...@carel.com>> ha scritto:
Hello everybody,

is there someone here who has got experience configuring Jolokia auth on 
ActiveMQ?
I'm facing issue as my previous mail - summarizing I have got 2 independent AMQ 
brokers running v5.17.2, and querying http://localhost:8161/api/jolokia on one 
broker I receive " HTTP/1.1 200 OK ", while on the other I get " HTTP/1.1 401 
Unauthorized "
The goal is to obtain 200 on both of them. Any advice?

Thank you so much in advance!

Distinti Saluti / Kind Regards
M.G.



Il giorno lun 29 gen 2024 alle ore 11:22 Marco Garavello 
<marco.garave...@carel.com<mailto:marco.garave...@carel.com>> ha scritto:
Hello everybody,

I'm new here, so excuse me if I will not adhere completely to the best 
practices of this mailing list. I'll do my best!

I've got a strange issue: doing "curl -v http://localhost:8161/api/jolokia"; on 
an Ubuntu VM with ActiveMQ v5.17.2 running, I receive this

*   Trying 127.0.0.1:8161...
* Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1) port 8161 (#0)
> GET /api/jolokia HTTP/1.1
> Host: localhost:8161
> User-Agent: curl/7.81.0
> Accept: */*
>
* Mark bundle as not supporting multiuse
< HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
< WWW-Authenticate: basic realm="ActiveMQRealm"
< Cache-Control: must-revalidate,no-cache,no-store
< Content-Type: text/html;charset=iso-8859-1
< Content-Length: 377
<
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"/>
<title>Error 401 Unauthorized</title>
</head>
<body><h2>HTTP ERROR 401 Unauthorized</h2>
<table>
<tr><th>URI:</th><td>/api/jolokia</td></tr>
<tr><th>STATUS:</th><td>401</td></tr>
<tr><th>MESSAGE:</th><td>Unauthorized</td></tr>
<tr><th>SERVLET:</th><td>-</td></tr>
</table>

</body>
</html>
* Connection #0 to host localhost left intact


BUT, if I do the same command on another Ubuntu VM with ActiveMQ v5.17.2 
running (but with different configuration, of course), I receive this

*   Trying 127.0.0.1:8161...
* TCP_NODELAY set
* Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1) port 8161 (#0)
> GET /api/jolokia HTTP/1.1
> Host: localhost:8161
> User-Agent: curl/7.68.0
> Accept: */*
>
* Mark bundle as not supporting multiuse
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
< Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:11:55 GMT
< X-FRAME-OPTIONS: SAMEORIGIN
< Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
< Cache-Control: no-cache
< Pragma: no-cache
< Expires: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:11:55 GMT
< Transfer-Encoding: chunked
[...]


So the question is: which configuration should I modify to control this 
different behaviour?
I already get through all the configuration files, making diff, setting things 
etc but still I'm not able to let the 1st machine answer 200 to my request, as 
the 2nd machine does.

Please advise
Have a good day!



Distinti Saluti / Kind Regards
M.G.

Reply via email to