Do you have a way to reproduce this? Can you elaborate at all on the
configuration, use-case, etc. which resulted in this? What has been the
impact?


Justin

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 3:01 PM William Crowell
<wcrow...@perforce.com.invalid> wrote:

> Justin,
>
> I do not think I have that situation:
>
> …
>       <cluster-connections>
>          <cluster-connection name="my-cluster">
>             <connector-ref>artemis</connector-ref>
>             <message-load-balancing>ON_DEMAND</message-load-balancing>
>             <max-hops>1</max-hops>
>             <static-connectors>
>                <connector-ref>node0</connector-ref>
>                <connector-ref>node1</connector-ref>
>             </static-connectors>
>          </cluster-connection>
>       </cluster-connections>
> …
>
> Regards,
>
> William Crowell
>
> From: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
> Date: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 3:57 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org <users@activemq.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: AMQ222139
> > Where would I see if I had multiple cluster connections to the same nodes
> using overlapping addresses?  Would that be in broker.xml?
>
> Yes. That would be in broker.xml.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 2:39 PM William Crowell
> <wcrow...@perforce.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Justin,
> >
> > Where would I see if I had multiple cluster connections to the same nodes
> > using overlapping addresses?  Would that be in broker.xml?
> >
> > I thought I was running into this, but we do not use temporary queues:
> >
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FARTEMIS-1967&data=05%7C02%7CWCrowell%40perforce.com%7C3926f7877093471d34e908dc7f507079%7C95b666d19a7549ab95a38969fbcdc08c%7C0%7C0%7C638525230677927126%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=oubjIjXoRYG6iO7Ugiei6%2BgRmFZrFJGjIbXvnuvOnvg%3D&reserved=0
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1967>
> >
> > This is Artemis 2.33.0.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > William Crowell
> >
> > From: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
> > Date: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 1:29 PM
> > To: users@activemq.apache.org <users@activemq.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: AMQ222139
> > As far as I know the only conditions that would result in this situation
> > are described in the warning message.
> >
> > Do you have multiple cluster connections to the same nodes using
> > overlapping addresses?
> >
> > Do you have a way to reproduce this? Can you elaborate at all on the
> > configuration, use-case, etc. which resulted in this? What has been the
> > impact?
> >
> > Lastly, what version of ActiveMQ Artemis are you using?
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 7:40 AM William Crowell
> > <wcrow...@perforce.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What would cause AMQ222139?  I have max-hops set to 1.
> > >
> > > 2024-05-24 17:28:04,155 WARN  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
> > > AMQ222139: MessageFlowRecordImpl
> > > [nodeID=2135063f-0407-11ef-9fff-0242ac110002,
> > > connector=TransportConfiguration(name=artemis,
> > >
> >
> factory=org-apache-activemq-artemis-core-remoting-impl-netty-NettyConnectorFactory)?port=61617&host=mqtt-7727-node1-boxview-internal,
> > >
> >
> queueName=$.artemis.internal.sf.my-cluster.2135063f-0407-11ef-9fff-0242ac110002,
> > >
> >
> queue=QueueImpl[name=$.artemis.internal.sf.my-cluster.2135063f-0407-11ef-9fff-0242ac110002,
> > > postOffice=PostOfficeImpl
> > > [server=ActiveMQServerImpl::name=mqtt-7727-node1.boxview.internal],
> > > temp=false]@3548f813, isClosed=false, reset=true]::Remote queue binding
> > >
> fa28ea36-19f2-11ef-b6bc-0242ac1100029a5d5fea-03fb-11ef-acb5-0242ac110002
> > > has already been bound in the post office. Most likely cause for this
> is
> > > you have a loop in your cluster due to cluster max-hops being too large
> > or
> > > you have multiple cluster connections to the same nodes using
> overlapping
> > > addresses
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Bill Crowell
> > >
> > >
> > > This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> > If
> > > you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> > > attachments and notify us immediately.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know
> > the content is safe.
> >
> >
> > This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> If
> > you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> > attachments and notify us immediately.
> >
> >
>
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
> This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us immediately.
>
>

Reply via email to